Reflection: “No Brakes! Risk and the adolescent brain.” By A. E. Kazdin and C. Rotella (February 10, 2010) from slate.com
Subjects: Risky behaviors, Teens and Tweens, Parent/Child communication effectiveness, school education programs for risk behaviors, peer pressure
Kazdin and Rotella argue that adolescents are no worse at assessing risk and making bad decisions then adults and that people of all ages underestimate likely dangers and underestimate likely ones. They state that recent studies have compared adolescent and adult levels of irrationality and found them to be similar, which means that adolescent behavior cannot be attributed to an inability to reason.
So what does that mean to current risk prevention practices? Kazdin and Rotella argue that reasoning with your child about why they shouldn’t engage in risky behavior is ineffective as a short term intervention tool. At first I was questioning of this statement. How can talking with your children be ineffective? It builds rapport and opens communication channels when done in a correct manner aka calm and reassuring versus yelling. But Kazdin and Rotella accept that there are positive long term effects of reasoning and talking to your child, they are just not interested in them. The authors are more interested in discovering short term prevention tools that have an effect on a child’s behavior in the present not the immeasurable future.
Kazdin and Rotella then argue that school educational programs are also an ineffective tool in preventing risky behaviors in adolescents. They dismiss these programs as being a “more expensive, elaborate, and systematic version” of parents reasoning with their children (Kazdin & Rotella, 2010, section 2). They support their argument with the fact that “90 percent of all U.S. high-school students have been exposed to sex, drug, and driver education in their schools and yet are still engaging in high-risk behaviors” (Kazdin & Rotella, 2010, section 2). I feel this argument is a weak sort of generalization. I would have rather they presented some statistics showing that the number of teenagers engaging in certain high risk behaviors has been unchanged since the implementation of education programs, because that is what they seem to be implying. Though I think statistics on the effectiveness of education programs will show numbers to refute their generalization.
Of all of Kazdin and Rotella’s arguments, the one that I agree with the most is that the presence or absence of peers has a large effect on whether or not a teen chooses to engage in risky behavior. Peers greatly influence the interests of tweens and teens in middle school and early high school (AACAP, 2001). This is why it is important for tweens and teens to have positive peer influences as well as having the ability to resist negative peer pressure (Search Institute, 2007).